We are sharing this update from ACCA, our professional body, for the interest of clients and contacts. The content is (c) ACCA
Exploring the accounting and tax implications of these changes
The new lease accounting requirements will mean more leases will be recognised on balance sheets as Right-of-Use (ROU) and lease liability. The principal difference is that, for lessees, there will no longer be a requirement to distinguish between an operating lease and a finance lease.
Accounting treatment
Para 1.47 of revised FRS 102 states that ‘a lessee shall not restate comparative information. Instead, it shall recognise the cumulative effect of initially applying the Periodic Review 2024 amendments to Section 20 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other component of equity, as appropriate) at the date of initial application.’
Prior-year adjustments must not be carried out on initial application of the new lease accounting provisions. FRS 102, para 1.51(a) states that the lessee shall recognise a lease liability at the date of initial application at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using:
- the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate or
- the lessee’s obtainable borrowing rate.
As highlighted within this ACCA technical factsheet:
Under the new recognition and measurement principles, a lessee does not distinguish between a finance lease and an operating lease. Most leases will be recognised on-balance sheet with two exceptions which relate to:
• leases of assets of low value
• short-term leases.
Leases of low value
FRS 102, para 20.11 provides a list of underlying assets whose value would not be considered low value as follows:
• cars, vans, buses, coaches, trams, trucks and lorries
• cranes, excavators, loaders and bulldozers
• telehandlers and forklifts
• tractors, harvesters and related attachments
• boats and ships
• railway rolling stock
• aircraft and aero engines
• land and buildings
• production line equipment.
The above is not a comprehensive list and professional judgement will, of course, be needed to assess what is, and what is not, low value. Effectively, if the leased asset is something like the list in paragraph 20.11 above, the asset will not be considered to be low value. Examples of assets which would be considered low value would be:
• laptop computers
• desktop computers
• tablets
• small items of office furniture
• mobile telephone (on, perhaps, a two-year contract).
FRS 102, para 20.5 provides an exemption from on-balance-sheet recognition for leases that are short-term. ‘Short-term leases’ are defined as: ‘A lease that, at the commencement date, has a lease term of 12 months or less. A lease that contains a purchase option is not a short-term lease.’ Potentially, short-term leases include evergreen leases which are those on a day-to-day, week-to-week or month-to-month basis.
Section 20 requires that at the inception date, an entity shall assess whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
A contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset when, throughout the period of use, the customer has both the right to direct the use of the identified asset, and the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from that use. If the customer has the right to control the use of the identified asset for only a portion of the term of the contract, the contract contains a lease for that portion of the term.
A reassessment of the ROU and lease liability may be required when there is modification of the terms and conditions of the contract.
Lease for serviced office
Normally a serviced office agreement may be accounted for as a licence to occupy (service agreement) rather than a lease under FRS 102, depending on the specific terms of the contract and when the accounting standard amendments are applied.
The key factor is whether the agreement conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset. The key assessment of whether the supplier has a substantive right to substitute the asset remains critical. If the serviced office provider retains the practical ability and economic benefit to move the occupant to a different space, it remains a service contract and does not go on the balance sheet.
Depreciation and finance cost
The ROU asset will initially be measured at the present value and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the length of the lease. In the profit and loss account, lessees will recognise both a depreciation charge on the ROU asset and a finance cost on the lease liability.
The finance cost is calculated using the effective interest rate applied to the remaining lease liability. Because the liability is higher at the start of the lease, the finance expense will usually be greater in the early years and gradually decrease as the liability is repaid.
Tax implications
The depreciation and finance cost will be allowable deductions for tax purposes. Consequently, the tax-deductible finance cost is generally higher at the beginning of the lease term and reduces progressively over the life of the lease.
Hence there will be some timing difference on the tax relief. For example, in the initial years, more tax relief will be claimable as compared to the later years. The commercial substance of a lease should be the same and the total expense recognised in the profit and loss account (and allowable for tax) over the life of the lease will be the same.
HMRC guidance on tax relief can be found within BLM50005, which clearly states:
The 2024 amendments to FRS 102 mandatorily replace the previous FRS 102 version for accounting period beginning on or after 1 January 2026. Entities have the option to adopt the revised standard early.
The lessee recognises the right-of-use asset and a lease liability on its balance sheet. Over the life of the lease the right-of-use asset is depreciated. Cash rentals are set against the lease liability and the interest charge. The cash rentals amount is usually equivalent to the sum of the depreciation and the interest charge (which is recognised on the reducing liability).
Useful resources